free web hit counter Press "Enter" to skip to content

Study finds real-world business leadership is not related to testosterone levels

Research released in Psychoneuroendocrinology found that testosterone levels do not forecast an individual’s management position.The scientists carried out a field research study in which they compared basal testosterone levels with management style amongst 125 supervisors and regular workers from different business in the Netherlands. The study found that high basal testosterone levels were related to a more authoritarian leadership design, but only in non-managers. The researchers likewise conducted a meta-analysis of 9 previous research studies with 1,103 total participants that analyzed the relationship between testosterone and management. Both the field study and the meta-analysis discovered no association in between high basal testosterone levels and leadership.PsyPost interviewed the study’s corresponding author, Leander van der Meij of Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.

Read his reactions below: PsyPost: Why were you thinking about this topic?We are fascinated by different forms of management and how they associate with our physiology. Of

unique interest to us was the hormonal agent testosterone. Typically, this hormonal agent has actually been connected to many unfavorable habits such as supremacy and aggression, and also strong types of leading such as dominant habits and authoritarian leadership. Recent studies have actually likewise recommended that the link between testosterone and those unfavorable behaviors are not so clear cut. In some cases testosterone is associated with favorable social habits, such as telling the reality and taking note of others. The relative new concept is that the specific context determines if testosterone is related to these negative anti-social behaviors or not. If the context promotes social status by being powerful or authoritarian we would anticipate to discover testosterone to be related to dominance. We wished to evaluate this concept in a sample of managers and non-managers. What should the average person eliminate from your study?That real-world leadership is frequently unrelated to supremacy and testosterone levels.Are there any major cautions? What questions still need to be addressed?The main difficulty is to identify if there are some contexts

in which testosterone is connected to leadership. Of unique interests are contexts that require a fast reaction and unified action, like during war. Do army officers have raised testosterone levels and does this relate to their management style?Is there anything else you would like to add?Our study shows that human behavior isintricate and versatile. This suggests that a person always needs to take into consideration the context in which habits occurs. Click on this link for reuse options!Copyright 2017 PsyPost